9
PLAYBOOK TEMPLATES

ISDA Master Agreement

An ISDA Master Agreement standardizes derivatives trading relationships, defining netting, collateral, and termination terms. This playbook assists counsel in managing counterparty risk and regulatory compliance under derivatives frameworks.

Governing Law & Jurisdiction

Why This Matters: Clear choice of law and forum minimizes uncertainty, speeds dispute resolution, and reduces the risk of conflicting judgments.

Negotiation strategy

If you're the Party A:

Advocate for a jurisdiction with favorable legal precedents and efficient dispute resolution processes, such as New York or London. Ensure the clause aligns with the company's risk management strategy.

If you're the Party B:

Negotiate for a jurisdiction that balances neutrality with cost-effectiveness, potentially suggesting arbitration to avoid lengthy court proceedings.

Essential elements

1

Governing Law

Specifies applicable legal framework.
2

Jurisdiction

Determines forum for legal disputes.
3

Arbitration

Outlines alternative dispute resolution.

Action framework

ACCEPT

Propose edits if the jurisdiction does not align with business goals or lacks neutrality.

EDIT

Reject if the clause specifies a jurisdiction with unfavorable legal precedents or high litigation costs.

ADD

Add if missing, ensuring inclusion of a neutral common law jurisdiction and arbitration details.

PRO TIP

Always verify that the chosen jurisdiction has a robust legal framework and aligns with both parties' interests.

Real-world examples

FAVORABLE

Preferred New York Governing Law

"This Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of New York, without regard to its conflict of laws principles."
NEUTRAL

Standard Jurisdiction Clause

"Each party irrevocably submits to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of [insert neutral common law jurisdiction]."
UNFAVORABLE

Unfavorable Texas Law

"This Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of Texas, which may require additional provisions to mitigate risk."

Alternative scenarios & positions

High-Risk Projects

In high-risk projects, prioritize jurisdictions with strong enforcement mechanisms to mitigate potential disputes.

Cross-Border Transactions

For cross-border deals, select a jurisdiction recognized for neutrality and international enforceability, like England and Wales.

Technology Agreements

In tech contracts, consider jurisdictions with advanced IP laws to protect proprietary technology.

Access all other DocJuris Playbooks

Launch in days, not months

Unlike complex CLMs with long implementations and steep learning curves, DocJuris is built for speed and simplicity. We integrate with your workflow—whether connecting to a CLM or uploading agreements manually—so you're up and running in days, not months.
WEEK 1
CLM Readiness and Design
Our CX team works with you to understand your contracting challenges, prioritize key workflows, and identify the biggest impact areas. We build a tailored implementation plan that fits your needs.
WEEK 2
Install Module
We connect DocJuris to your contract repositories, set up admin and user accounts, and ensure your environment is ready for success.
WEEK 3
Deliver & Test
Your team builds initial playbooks, reviews existing clause libraries, and trains the DocJuris agent to align with your internal standards and negotiation positions.
WEEK 4
Launch
We support you in rolling out DocJuris to a pilot group or your full organization—with launch materials, training, and hands-on support to drive adoption from day one.

Not another CLM

Tackle everything your team needs using existing IT without expensive consultants, outrageous user licensing fees, or complex coding. DocJuris takes on the heavy lift and delivers your requirements with its people, process, and technology.

See how DocJuris can automate your legal, procurement, and sales operations.

Request demo
© 2025 DocJuris, Inc. All rights reserved. Patent Pending.
DocJuris is not a law firm or a substitute for an attorney or law firm. We cannot provide any kind of advice, explanation, opinion, or recommendation about possible legal rights, remedies, defenses, options,selection of forms or strategies.